सदस्यसम्भाषणम्:Guruguhadasa
|
तव मार्गदर्शनाय विद्यन्ते एतानि पृष्ठानि  विकिपीडियायाः परिचयः देवनागरीलिप्या कथं लेखनीयम्? नवागतेभ्यः परिचयः स्वशिक्षा वि-पत्र-पञ्जीकरणं करोतु
|
-Hemant wikikosh (चर्चा) १६:३३, १५ दशम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
Talkback[सम्पादयतु]
Message added ०४:००, २१ दशम्बर् २०११ (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Rao7 •Talk ०४:००, २१ दशम्बर् २०११ (UTC)
Article Titles[सम्पादयतु]
Dear sir,
Please avoid creating articles with titles like A,B,C,D,E etc... Although the contents of such articles are much appreciated, it will be much better if you could make them under one long list and a common title. For eg: Technical terninology or Scientific vocabulory etc. (whichever is more apt for the contents).
Thank you. Viswaprabha (चर्चा) ०७:५८, ५ जनुवरि २०१२ (UTC)
Ms. Viswaprabha !
I had no choice but to create the respective pages with English alphabetical index, since, already the name of the link has been given on the main page as "vaigyanika shabdavali:" . This link was created after lot of conversation, persuasion & difficulty. I did not think that a second title is warranted. I am concentrating more on creating & storing the content before I forget or lose track and as and when they strike me, rather than the technicalities which I am not and do not want to be familiar with at present. All the content has been generated purely out of sheer experience & standard practices without much consulting / borrowing / stealing, etc..
Whosoever you may be, if you feel that this is not apt or convenient or that it is not going the way Wikipedia wants, you are free to change the method of display and or title to " Scientific & Technical Terminology ". You may also alter its presentation or scuttle & scrap the work with intimation to me to that effect.
I will not continue and I am stopping this also for the present, till I get your response which I suggest you to send latest by 11.00 AM of 06-01-2012, failing which, I will permanently stop my contributions. I can divert my energies & time for my other philanthropic & public good causes. No need to get offended by my straight talk please. I speak science & sense. I have no intentions to cause controversies & difficulties.
Thank you.
Guruguhadasa (चर्चा)१४:४२, ५ जनुवरि २०१२ (UTC)
Dear Mr. Guruguhadasa,
Please don't take anything to heart.
Regarding problem of titles, I have now renamed each of page as subpage of विकिपीडिया:वैज्ञानिक-शब्दावलिः so now 'A' will be विकिपीडिया:वैज्ञानिक-शब्दावलिः/A, B will be विकिपीडिया:वैज्ञानिक-शब्दावलिः/B, and so on. You can name new pages in similar fashion for remaining letters. You have to simply click on the letters and the page edit box will come with the desired name now.
For wikipedia every contributor is important. And it is also normal for one contributor to suggest changes to another contributor, after all this is collaborative project. Please continue with your valuable work. Thanks. -Hemant wikikosh (चर्चा) १०:०२, ५ जनुवरि २०१२ (UTC)
Mr. Hemant,
Thanks for the reply. I have no objection to anybody suggesting or making changes, only it should be in the right direction and spirit, commensurate with the objectives of Wiki. If you read carefully, I only said, I do not want to get involved with the technicalities due to paucity of time and also that content is more important to me. Styling, designing, etc can be taken care of by someone else without affecting the continuity, presentation & content.
I do not see the utility of the renaming excercise you have done. I proposed to write an introduction in the main page of the shabdavali before the alphabetical index to give some continuity also. That's why I left the page clean with only the index. The heading "Scientific & Technical Terminology" has not been put anywhere ?
Guruguhadasa (चर्चा) २२:००, ५ जनुवरि २०१२ (UTC)
//Styling, designing, etc can be taken care of by someone else without affecting the continuity, presentation & content.
I agree with you in this regard, and that will anyway happen for any article on Wikipedia.
Renaming was necessary because directly lexicographic type work should not come in main space on an encyclopedia (that's why, as you can see, I have added namespace विकिपीडिया: in the new names as prefixes). And we are giving it as a help module so विकिपीडिया namespace is best for it. But I am not saying that you are required to follow all these rules from the beginning; with time you can improve your acquaintance with these guidelines. You can continue writing new words in these and later I will do some formatting and try to improve its presentation etc. Thanks. -Hemant wikikosh (चर्चा) १७:००, ५ जनुवरि २०१२ (UTC)
It is not at all convenient to use the colon as a separator for samskritam words. Their resemblance to the visarga is a very confusing and irritating factor. Look at the headings - यॊजकसम्भाषणम्: , विकिपिडिया: , etc. are very wrong with the colon separator. So you better use some other separator or punctuation mark. I won't compromise on this even with the best explanation you may ever offer.
- ...then I am also not interested in giving you 'explanations' (why should I be?).
- I have been answering your unjustly furious comments in a calm way, and you are continually taking it as if I am helplessly bound to answer in this way. Anyway, this is my last comment on 'any of your meaningless questions ever'. Thanks. -Hemant wikikosh (चर्चा) ०६:५८, ८ जनुवरि २०१२ (UTC)
- ...then I am also not interested in giving you 'explanations' (why should I be?).
This is not a boxing ring , isn't it ? And I am not your punching bag ! You are very good at jumping to conclusions without proper analysis. You have blurted out whatever has come to your mind on the spur of the moment. " Discretion is the better part of valour " - as a moderator, it applies to you even more. I can write much better English than you can ever.
Who told you or why do you think that I was furious ? It was just straight talk out of conviction as already pointed out. If you cannot understand or comprehend it, it is your problem, not mine. Just see above , your reply is the one that is blunt, furious & meaningless and unwarranted as elsewhere too. You have forgotten or don't know that this text messaging & chat is a dispassionate medium , which does not tell all the emotions. Don't just take the authoritative or superiority mood. I am not at your mercy either. I don't need you. And with this kind of attitudinal dysfunction, you don't deserve to work in any public dealing nor any further reaction. No thanks.
शान्तं शान्तम्! We are all just carpenters and masons in the building of a great temple of knowledge. Let us just do our mean and unimportant roles now and yet be the great pioneers of future!
Let no ego take over us. Let no ignorance rule us!
शान्तं शान्तम्!
You both are nice and good! In fact, very very good at that!
Together, we are building the great mansion of future out of foregone past!
Please be calm and be good to each and everyone! Viswaprabha (चर्चा) २१:०१, ८ जनुवरि २०१२ (UTC)
You can still continue...[सम्पादयतु]
Just to remind you that, if you don't like me, you can still continue your work; because I am not the only administrator here, there are many who can help you when needed (as you rightly said). Thanks. -Hemant wikikosh (चर्चा) १६:४६, १० जनुवरि २०१२ (UTC)